These don't seem to be too high of standards, yet so much contemporary worship fails to meet one or all of them. I was listening to a song by Hillsong United the other day titled "All I Need is You." (Disclaimer: this is not a generalized criticism of all Hillsong, just this song. There are a couple of their songs that really do point me to the gospel). Good premise, right? Let's check the lyrics:
Verse 1:
Left my fear by the side of the road
Hear you speak
Won't let go
Fall to my knees as I lift my hands to pray
Let's break down verse 1 a bit. We are invited to sing "left my fear by the side of the road" which sounds pretty good, and it begs the question: why? Apparently because we "Hear you speak", in which the you is presumably God, but what he's saying remains a mystery to us. Perhaps we are just supposed to know how hearing God say something makes us leave our fears behind, but it all seems a bit too vague for me. The verse continues with the phrase "won't let go", which again begs the question: of what? Again it is presumably God who we will not let go of, but again with no explanation of why. And how does hearing him speak lead me to not let go? Finally it concludes with the phrase: "fall to my knees as I lift my hands to pray". At this point we have managed to combine four classic spiritual phrases "left my fear", "hear you speak", "won't let go" and "fall to my knees" with no particular explanation as to how any of this relates to Jesus, or how or why these things connect with who God is in Scripture. Now don't get me wrong, every song doesn't need to be an in depth exposition of the a specific element of the gospel, but when vaguery and incoherence dominate the first verse, it doesn't bode well for the rest of the song.
Eventually we get the chorus (which in true Hillsong fashion is repeated at least a dozen times):
All I need is you
All I need is you Lord
Is you Lord
Again, there's certainly nothing wrong with the claim of the chorus. But apart from some reason why all we need is Jesus, is this just mere sentimentalism? I mean does repeating these words over and over actually meet us in our dissatisfaction and longing for redemption? Perhaps it makes us feel better for a moment, but in the end we must know how Jesus is our complete satisfaction.
Eventually we get to some gospel in the second verse:
One more day and it's not the same
Your Spirit calls my heart to sing
Drawn to the voice of my Saviour once again
Where would my soul be without your Son
Gave his life to save the earth
Rest in the thought that you're watching over me
So why is all we need "you Lord"? Because he's the "Saviour", without whom where would our souls be, and he "gave his life to save the earth." So we have at least something pointing us to the work of Christ, though it remains thoroughly unexplored (the phrasing that he "gave his life to save the earth" sounds a bit too Captain Planet for me, but we'll go with it). At this point you might be thinking, "Kyle, you're being way too analytical about this. It's just a song." But of course that gets at the most central problem we have with how we worship: most of the time we don't think about what we're singing.
And that's the real kicker: generally when we sing worship songs we aren't thinking about what we're singing. When we're singing most songs we aren't thinking about what we're singing. That's why Christians listen to Dave Matthews and Jay-Z (two very good musical artists in their own genres) and say "I don't pay attention the lyrics" (which of course is somewhat ironic given the fact that they could most likely sing along word-for-word with the lyrics). The problem is, when we don't think about what we're singing with regard to worship music, then corporate worship is really no different than a Coldplay concert. I've been to both. Both can give you chills and this amazing subjective experience of oneness that is almost spiritual. But it isn't worship. Or at least it's not worshiping Jesus. Worshiping Jesus means that we actually think about who he is and what he's done more than that sweet guitar riff that sent chills up my spine. Now the two aren't necessarily mutually exclusive, but you can't have the riff without the work of Jesus. Then it's just Coldplay's "Fix You". I used the Hillsong song above because it really is one of those songs that is musically pretty engaging; you could sing it without ever thinking about what you're singing.
And my guess is that's what most of us do. We measure worship based on whether it gave us musical chills in our spine which we call the Spirit, instead of whether it preaches the gospel to us. But the call of worship, whether it be through music, preaching, the Lord's Supper or prayer, is a call to look to Jesus, to make him the center, to hear the great Story of his work on our behalf so that we don't have to work. Or in the words of the great hymn:
Jesus paid it all, all to him I owe.
Sin had left a crimson stain he washed it white as snow.
I'm all about this Kyle. I like where you're coming from and I certainly don't think this should be labeled as a "soapbox". Soapbox has a negative connotation. What you're talking about is very important and something that EVERYONE needs to sit down and think about. I don't agree with everything you're saying (Jay-Z's only good album is the Black Album - there are much better representations of hip-hop's elite), but that's not the point. The point is that your concern for this subject, forces me to think about it myself even if it leads to contradictory opinions. Stimulating thought in others that is ultimately aimed at Christ is worth every morsel of effort spent on this.
ReplyDeleteAll that being said, I don't know if I agree that for worship to point to Christ - it must be through a lyrical avenue. Just as there are certainly infinite ways to worship Christ outside of music, there must be many ways to worship him within music.
But yea...great stuff.
Yeah, I suppose I'm looking at the specific context of a corporate worship (music) setting. Basically a situation where we say "we're getting together to sing praise to God". In that context, we should be conscious that indeed we are singing to God, so therefore, what we are singing is important.
ReplyDeleteCertainly there is many ways to worship God in music that isn't specifically lyrical. I feel like I can worship God listening to the piece Adagio for Strings or the soundtrack to LoTR as well. I just wouldn't use them in a corporate worship setting.
Yeah, I think I've had some of these same thoughts in the past (in the corporate setting, as you said in your comment, Kyle) -- I think there's a song by Crowder that's like "Running through the forest / Dive into the lake / Bare feet on beaches white" that we sang at Cru for awhile and I'm just like "what the heck are we even singing about right now??" I think for songs with lyrics like that where they could honestly mean anything we should at least look at the Scripture that the lyrics are pointing towards. Anyway, I like the thoughts, and I agree with Pavan as well (although I've heard good things about Jay Z's new album too).
ReplyDeleteIn that case, I'm with you Kyle - wholeheartedly. And I'll definitely be checking out Jay-Z's new album now that it has gotten an endorsement from Dave Rock.
ReplyDelete